![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Because when I think Super-studio Superstar to carry a movie about a woman wronged in love with grace, resolve, and dignity so as to not make her a whiny wimp, I think Meg "Cutesy" Ryan. And when I think Super-studio Super-tramp Superstar to knock everyone's socks off, I think Eva Mendez (who?).

And what happened to Annette Benning's face?
Oh god, it's a romcom screwball! The best friends are cast inspired, though.

And what happened to Annette Benning's face?
Oh god, it's a romcom screwball! The best friends are cast inspired, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 02:46 pm (UTC)"I ordered you a gimlet. I know you don't drink in the afternoon, but you will eventually, so you might as well start now."
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 05:40 pm (UTC)In other words, removing the whole purpose behind the original. Like rewriting Gone With The Wind to make Scarlett "more sympathetic" and not so bitchy. Great idea, huh?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 06:03 pm (UTC)No fucking shit. You gotta be kidding me, sisterhood? It doesn't just remove the keen observation to the lengths women clung to what defined them (men, any men), it kills half the plot! You are so right, it's exactly like Happy Scarlett.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 07:04 pm (UTC)The 50s musical SUCKED and so will this new version.
Every gay guy I've talked to about this movie is disgusted, but a couple were interested in it purely for the car crash effect.
But for me the biggest problem is Jada Fucking Pinkett Smith.
The bitch CANNOT ACT. And just what I saw of her in the commercials was enough to scare me off.
Whatever. It won't make a dime.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 09:23 pm (UTC)On the plus side...
Date: 2008-08-30 11:19 pm (UTC)Re: On the plus side...
Date: 2008-08-31 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 01:01 am (UTC)